-
Growing Opposition Mounts Against FCC Cell Tower Fast-Track Proposal (25-276)
Over 2000 comments filed to preserve local government control for cell towers and wireless deployment. […]
-
Official Letters Opposing FCC Cell Tower Fast-Track Rules
Numerous Organizations and Local Governments Oppose the FCC Cell Tower Fast-Track Rules In formal filings […]
-
Regulatory Gaps in U.S. Wireless Radiation Policy: Public Health Implications and Recommendations for Reform
American Public Health Association roundtable on regulatory Gaps in U.S. Wireless Radiation Policy: Public Health Implications and Recommendations for Reform by Theodora Scarato focused on how the FCC, EPA, FDA, NIH and OSHA address cell tower health risk and science on wireless and cell phone effects.
-
Environmental Health Sciences Urges Senate to Demand Transparency and Accountability from FCC on Cell Tower, Cell Phone and Wireless Radiation Risk
Environmental Health Sciences Urges Senate to Demand Transparency and Accountability from FCC on Cell Tower, Cell Phone and Wireless Health Risk
-
The FCC Witheld Cell Phone Radiation Tests That Found High Radiation
Internal documents on cell phone safety released in 2023 found that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found some cell phones exceed the FCC’s own cell phone radiofrequency (RF) radiation limits when tested as if they were carried close to the body. The agency’s laboratory tests used a 2 mm distance position—similar to a phone in a pocket—measured RF radiation levels above federal limits, yet the findings were never disclosed to the public.
-
Montgomery County vs. the FCC: How One Community Challenged “5G First, Safety Second” Policy
In 2019, Montgomery County, Maryland took historic legal action to become the only jurisdiction in the nation to directly challenge the FCC on radiofrequency (RF) health and safety, arguing that the federal government was advancing a “5G First, Safety Second” agenda.
-
Theodora Scarato
Theodora Scarato is Director of the Wireless & EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences, policy expert, researcher. Environmental Health Sciences, RF radiation health effects, EMF science expert, cell tower policy expert, FCC lawsuit EHT v FCC, children’s health EMF, ICBE-EMF expert, environmental health policy leader, wireless safety science
-
Landmark Federal Court Decision On Wireless Radiation Human Exposure Limits
In a federal court ruling- Environmental Health Trust (EHT) v. FCC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled the FCC’s wireless radiation limits “arbitrary and capricious,” citing failures to address health risks from cell towers, long-term RF exposure, reproductive and brain effects, and children’s heightened vulnerability.
EHT et al v FCC
Archive
Categories
Recent Posts
- The Science on Wildlife and Wireless Radiation
- Growing Opposition Mounts Against FCC Cell Tower Fast-Track Proposal (25-276)
- Official Letters Opposing FCC Cell Tower Fast-Track Rules
- Regulatory Gaps in U.S. Wireless Radiation Policy: Public Health Implications and Recommendations for Reform
- Letter to Senate Calling For FCC Transparency and Accountability on Cell Tower and Wireless Radiation Risk
Tags
brendan carr cdc cell phone cell phone safety cell tower cell tower cancer cell tower health effects cell towers cell tower safety cell tower school EHT et al v FCC ELF EMFs FCC Kenneth Foster Magnetic fields property value public health science on cell tower health risks Theodora Scarato Wi-Fi wildlife wireless health facts wireless radiation
