How to Submit a Comment

How to Submit a Comment

to the FCC Cell Tower Fast Track Plan 25-276

Here are several ways you can submit comments to the FCC, depending on the length and format. 

How To Submit A Short Comment

Of no more than 2,000 characters:

How to Submit a Longer Comment

To submit a Standard Filing (more than 2,000 characters):

Submit your comments to the FCC before Dec. 31, and urge your local elected officials to also submit comments from their locality. You also can submit “reply comments” about what others submit until January 15, 2026. 

Thousands of comments are needed! 

A Short  2,000 character FCC comment for 25-276

I strongly oppose the FCC’s proposal to fast-track wireless deployments by preempting local authority in 25-276. These rules would undermine public safety, democracy, and statutory limits on FCC power.

The rules would shift administrative and oversight costs from industry to taxpayers. 

Local governments must retain zoning authority because they are uniquely equipped to evaluate site-specific risks—terrain, fall zones, fire hazards, structural safety, environmental constraints, and the character of historic or residential areas. Setbacks and placement standards are essential tools that protect communities, liability risk, and property value.  The FCC’s proposed shot clocks and “deemed granted” approvals would deprive communities of meaningful review, public notice, and basic safeguards against preventable hazards.

The 1996 Telecom Act expressly preserves state and local authority over the placement, construction, and modification of wireless facilities. Nothing in the Act authorizes the FCC to replace local zoning with federal mandates. Courts have repeatedly reaffirmed this balance. Many localities have demonstrated that reasonable setbacks and aesthetic reviews do not prohibit service; they simply ensure responsible deployment with safety valves when coverage would otherwise be impaired.

The FCC cannot lawfully preempt local RF-related policies when it has not complied with the D.C. Circuit’s 2021 EHT v. FCC decision. The Commission has never explained how its 1996 RF limits protect children, wildlife, or the public from long-term, cumulative, or non-thermal effects. Until the FCC fulfills its court-ordered obligations, it cannot displace local safeguards or fast-track infrastructure that increases RF exposure.

Prohibiting local requirements for independent RF compliance testing would leave the public dependent on industry self-certification despite the FCC lacking any monitoring or enforcement program. Violations of FCC limits are reportedly widespread. 


Download Our Factsheets on the FCC’s Proposal Here